← Back to MaxLase Resources

Pulsed Nd:YAG spot welder · front-panel calculator

MaxLase Welder Panel

Standard
Also available

The job

Load

Beam profile

rounded pulse · flat‑top spot — typical of a lamp‑pumped Nd:YAG rod
Power vs time
Across the spot

What that shot delivers

Energy / pulsepeak × width
Peak power
Average power
Duty cycleon-time fraction
Melt depthestimate ±50 %
Weld mode
Average power against the machine rating
Within limits

Notes & machine setup

limits, calibration, and how it all works

Machine setup

Panel limits (this machine)

MinMaxStep
Pulse (ms)
Current (A)
Voltage (%)
Freq (Hz)
Spot (mm)

The ends of the ranges on your own panel. Values outside them turn the row red instead of being silently clamped.

Calibration — one measured shot

Current setting (A)
Pulse width (ms)
Energy produced (J)
Lasing threshold (A)

Until you enter one, everything runs off a placeholder lamp curve — right shape, wrong numbers. Lamp current is not watts: output climbs from a threshold, so one real shot fixes the whole curve. On the 200P it is voltage, and stored energy goes as V². Leave the threshold at 0 if you don't know it.

Beam shape & rating

Pulse shape
Spot profile
Rated average (W)

A lamp-pumped Nd:YAG rod gives a rounded pulse and runs highly multimode, so the focused spot is closer to a flat top than a Gaussian. Those are the defaults.

Where the recommended settings come from

Stainless steel, gold, silver, copper and aluminum come from manufacturer parameter tables for this class of machine; the 230B and 200P start from the 200B numbers. Steel, inconel, platinum and brass are marked derived — scaled from those by 1064 nm absorptivity, thermal conductivity and melting point. A place to begin, not a spec. Always test on scrap first.

The metals

The four knobs

Current sets the height

P_peak = K × (I − I_th)

The current knob drives the flashlamp, and laser output climbs roughly linearly once the lamp is over the lasing threshold. It is not volts × amps, which is why the tool wants one measured shot instead of guessing.

Pulse sets the width

E = P_peak × t_p × shape

Joules are the area under the shot. Wider pulse at the same current means more energy into the same spot — more melt depth, more heat into the part, more risk of blowing thin sections.

Freq sets how often

P_avg = E × f

Every shot is identical; frequency only decides how many per second. This is the number the machine's rating caps, and it is what limits how fast you can run a seam.

Spot sets the concentration

density = P_peak / (π d² / 4)

The same joules through a smaller spot is a completely different weld. Roughly: under about 0.3 kW/mm² you are only heating the surface; from there up to about 10 kW/mm² is conduction welding, a shallow rounded bead; above that you are into a keyhole — deep, narrow, and easy to overdo on a thin edge. Silver and copper sit high on that scale on purpose, because most of the beam bounces straight off.

Where the melt-depth number comes from

Two limits, whichever bites first. Energy: the absorbed joules can only melt so much metal — depth = A × E divided by spot area, density, specific heat to the melting point and latent heat of fusion. Conduction: heat only travels √(4 α t) into the part during the pulse, so nothing deeper than that gets hot. The two are combined with a melting efficiency that falls as heat runs sideways out of the spot — which is why silver and copper give thin welds for a lot of energy.

Treat it as ±50 %, and as a comparison tool rather than a measurement. It assumes a clean, flat, well-fitted surface and a conduction weld. It does not model keyhole drilling, weld-pool convection, joint gaps, surface finish, oxide, shielding gas, or heat left over from the previous shot. Absorptivity in particular is a moving target: a polished silver surface reflects about 97 % cold, but once a melt pool forms coupling climbs steeply, so the figures used here are effective weld-time values, not room-temperature ones.

Reference welding-trial data

From a published welding-trial study. Note the interaction times: 0.1–0.19 s, roughly a hundred times longer than a 2 ms spot shot, so the penetration column does not transfer directly to this machine. The power-density column does — it is the same axis your shot is measured on above.

#Laser powerScan speedPower densityInteraction timePoint energyPenetrationIntermetallic

Sources

Shape and driver background — RP Photonics: lamp-pumped lasers · AMADA WELD TECH: Nd:YAG vs fiber · Laser Welding Fundamentals (PDF)